Antonio is a native of Mexico where he carried out his undergraduate studies at Universidad de las Américas Puebla. He graduated with a degree in Political Science (B.A.) in 2015. He obtained an MSc by Research (Merit) in Science and Technology Studies from the University of Edinburgh in 2017.
Before arriving at Edinburgh, Antonio worked as research assistant in the construction of the Global Impunity Index. He has also been a visiting Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg, Germany.
His PhD focuses on analysing how environmental indicators are constructed not only using 'objective' methodologies but also through social events that go from mundane daily activities to formal academic events. His PhD has as theoretical perspective Social Shaping of Technology using concepts like 'black box', 'stabilisation', 'standardisation' and 'objectivity'.
MSc by Research Science and Technology Studies The University of Edinburgh (2016-2017). Dissertation on: “Opening the Black Box of Indicators: An STS approach to the Social Construction of Environmental Knowledge.” Main Supervisor Dr Eugenia Rodrigues. Second Supervisor Dr Gian Marco Campagnolo.
B.A. Political Science -Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Mexico (UDLAP, 2010-2015). Dissertation on “The recruitment process in Autonomous Organisms: The case of the National Human Rights Commission”.
Awards and Funding
PhD Science and Technology Studies funded by the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (100%) 3 years
Master by Research Science and Technology Studies funded by the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (90%) 1 year
Master by Research Science and Technology Studies funded, 90%, by the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies Department, The University of Edinburgh (10%) 1 year
MSc by Research Science and Technology Studies (Awarded with Merit)
Visiting Research Fellow Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg, Germany. (2 months, 2016).
Secretary of the Mexican Society, Edinburgh University Students' Association (2017 -2018)
Class Rep MSc by Research Science and Technology Studies (2016-2017)
Science and technology studies Environmental Sociology Social Shaping of Technology Policy Indicators Democracy and Social Indicators The politics of transparency and accountability Sociology of Knowledge sociology of scientific knowledge
Research assistant for the Global Impunity Index - Mexico 2015 (CIESIJ, coordinated by Le Clercq Ortega, Juan and Sanchez Lara, Gerardo.)
Facilitator Research Skills in the Social Sciences: Data Collection (postgraduate course) Semester 1 (2019 - )
Tutor Science, Nature and Environment (undergraduate course) Semester 2 (2018 - )
Tutor for International Cooperation in Europe and Beyond (undergraduate course) Semester 1 (2017-2018)
Dr Eugenia Rodrigues
Dr Sarah Parry
The use of quantitative tools as a technology for comparing and forecasting a wide array of issues; and guiding the creation of public policy has increased over the last decades. The democratisation of the production of quantitative data has brought a sharing of a powerful resource such as policy-related knowledge. Nowadays the state is not the only actor using quantitative information to govern. Non- State Actors (i.e. NGOs, and universities) have been producing tools that allow us to observe the performance of different countries on a wide variety of issues and also, to forecast possible scenarios. For example, respect for human rights is measured, through an annual index, by Human Rights Watch; Yale and Columbia Universities have been producing the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), a benchmarking tool that ranks countries’ performance on different environmental issues, for almost 20 years. Also, there has been an increase in the development of tools trying to predict social and political events like electoral turnout previous to elections or the forecasting of violence due to climate change. These tools do not only measure and compare countries but may also give recommendations or “guidelines” about how to achieve better scores. Part of the trust in these tools is based on the objectivity that they claim to have as quantitative technologies. However, little is known about the processes through which researchers transform single data points into global measurements; not by statistical procedures but by a continuous reflection of what does it mean to create possible worlds at a distance.
The production of this type of tools is far from being the result of automated statistical processes. By conducting two participant observations at two research centres it was possible to acknowledge the importance of mundane acts. It is through unrecorded events, that producers give an ethos to these quantitative tools. Although methodologies are publicly available, it is through internal discussions, reflections, choices and interests that quantitative knowledge comes to be framed by Non-State Actors.