In June 2000, during the presentation of the first draft of the Human Genome Project, US President Bill Clinton stated that humanity was learning “the language in which God created life” and that the “new knowledge” scientists were gaining would “revolutionise the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of most, if not all, human diseases.” This ceremony marked the climax of genomics, the science of collecting and compiling information about the fine chemical structure or sequence of human and other species’ genetic material. Since then, a huge volume of genome sequence information has become available in open access databases, but its translation into medically relevant outcomes has proved trickier than expected.

Our project looks at how this medical translation was envisaged during the sequencing of the human, yeast and pig genomes, and how this envisaged translation shaped the collection, organisation and dissemination of the data. We start with the hypothesis that these three major and scientifically celebrated genomic projects began as bottom-up initiatives: a growing amount of sequence information was gathered through the coordination and pooling of results of a relatively large number of laboratories that were interested in the data, despite not specifically working on sequencing. As the 1990s went by, this bottom-up approach was abandoned in favour of a top-down strategy in which a selective club of factory-style centres sequenced each genome from one end to the other. These centres, unlike their predecessors, were not directly involved in the further exploitation of the data.

By investigating and comparing these changing organisational strategies, we hope to offer insights that will improve the translation of genomic information into medical, agricultural or other practical outcomes today. This is a five-year project that started in October 2016 and is funded by the European Research Council. Our methodology combines historical work in archives, qualitative social science and bibliometric analysis.

Our overarching research questions are:

1) Was the medical translation of genomic data postponed to after the completion of the human, yeast and pig genome projects? If so, when did this occur and why?

2) What happened to the visions of translation and bottom-up ways of organising the delivery of the data that were discarded in favour of genome completion?

3) Is the strategic choice of completion over usability relevant for current research projects that aim to translate biomedical or other forms of big data?

Latest Blog Posts

Exploring pig genetics in France

At the end of November, I followed in the footsteps of many of the pig geneticists whose work I have been researching, and visited the Jouy-en-Josas campus of the French Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), just south of Paris. At there and other INRA sites in Paris itself, … (Read more)

Advisory Board Meeting and Second Phase of Project

First Advisory Board meeting The TRANSGENE team presented its first findings to an Advisory Board comprised by Stephen Hilgartner (Cornell University), Robert Bud (Science Museum, London), Michel Morange (University Paris 6 and Ecole Normale Superieure), Abigail Woods (King’s College, London) and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (Max Planck Institute for the History of … (Read more)

The unusual pioneer of the Human Genome Project

When we think about prime-movers, proposing for the first time the idea of scientifically tackling the human genome, the usual suspects come to our mind: reputed biomedical Nobel Prize winners such as James Watson, Walter Gilbert or Renato Dulbecco, who formulated their grand idea in the front pages of Science, … (Read more)


…at the British Society for the History of Science conference Amongst the sizeable Edinburgh contingent at the annual British Society for the History of Science conference, this year held in York, were representatives from the TRANSGENE project team. Miguel García-Sancho presented the progress on the yeast strand of the project … (Read more)

June events

The TRANSGENE project operates within the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies (STIS) subject group at the University of Edinburgh. This multidisciplinary affiliation, and association with the Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation (ISSTI) research network, enables us to discuss our work with researchers that have a wide … (Read more)

Classifying people, practices and institutions

Just as classifications of species, genes, stages of development, or macromolecules can shape research in biology, classification in the humanities and social sciences can condition our analyses. In the pig strand of the project I’m working on, classifying people, practices and institutions is necessary. My aim is to explain, so … (Read more)

The yeast telomeres

Writing the history of the yeast genome project starting from the end, more precisely the chromosome ends, can be an instructive exercise. Chromosome ends (telomeres) are specialised structures essential for chromosome maintenance and genome stability. As yeast telomeres are similar in structure and function to the telomeres of the other … (Read more)

Collaborating with the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)

In March 2017, I am conducting a three-week visiting post-doctoral fellowship at the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI, Cambridge UK), for the bibliometric and “big data” strand of the project. I am collaborating with the EBI’s Literature Services to advance the project’s aims of mapping institutional networks in genomic sequencing initiatives … (Read more)

The history of pig genome research enters the matrix

In the TRANSGENE project we are committed to using approaches from different disciplines to make sense of the historical material, and to generate new data from which to form a picture of the genomic research. One of the key approaches is the use of quantitative methods, imported from the social … (Read more)

Tracing the history of European biotechnology in the HAEU

My week-long visit to the Historical Archives of the European Union (HAEU) in Florence has proved to be a remarkable opportunity for investigating the ‘behind the scenes’ of European biotechnology policies in the 1980s and 1990s. During my visit in Florence I mainly examined documents available in the Gordon Adam’s … (Read more)

Scientific archives and the history of genomics

In November 2016 Miguel Garcia-Sancho, James Lowe and I attended the Workshop on Scientific Archives organised by Anne Flore-Laloë, archivist at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) in Heidelberg. The meeting brought together tens of archivists from Germany, France, Switzerland, UK, US and Canada. The workshop presentations focused on best … (Read more)